Select region
Submit

How ECMO can make a difference in treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

Topic
Intensive Care
eCPR in Cardiac Arrest
Topic
Intensive Care
Subscribe

What is eCPR and how does it work?

Survival rates for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are low and decrease with time between cardiac arrest and intervention[1]. Mortality rates for OHCA patients are estimated to be around 90% globally[1], and those patients who do survive often experience neurological deficits. Recent randomized controlled trials [12][14] suggest that eCPR (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) may potentially increase the odds of positive clinical outcomes in selected OHCA patients. Innovations from leading centers are bringing this life-saving treatment to larger patient populations. 

eCPR involves veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support in cardiac arrest patients. The system drains blood, exchanges gases, and then returns the blood to the arterial system to maintain systemic perfusion. The technique is recommended in guidelines by the American Heart Association (AHA)[2] and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO)[3]. Placing VA-ECMO on patients provides quick hemodynamic support in the case of cardiac failure. 

get22121_graph_ECMO_Insight_R03_1280_eCPR.png

Treating Cardiac Arrest with eCPR [4]

Mobile eCPR can support earlier intervention

eCPR is typically performed in-hospital, but due to the time-sensitive nature of OHCA, some hospitals have optimized their programs to minimize the time between arrest and intervention. This includes careful coordination with first responders, rapid mobilization of highly trained teams and, in some cases, initiation outside of the hospital.

One well-known example is a “mobile ECMO Truck,” developed by the University of Minnesota team in the United States [5]. This mobile ECMO Truck and the ECMO team meet the patient partway to the hospital. Reducing the time to cannulation, the team has expanded the coverage area and brought the therapy to more patients.

There are also some programs in Europe for treating patients with early eCPR. In the ON-SCENE trial led by Dr. Dinis Reis Miranda, four mobile helicopter-based medical teams are bringing pre-hospital eCPR to the entire Netherlands [6][7]. Each of the teams are equipped with the Getinge Cardiohelp system to enable earlier treatment for OHCA patients. The trial allows the team to place a VA-ECMO on patients who haven’t responded to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) within 20 minutes. The three-year trial started in 2022 and has a goal of saving 30% of the 200 patients in the ECMO group [8].

netherlands Medical team.jpg

Medical teams from the ON-SCENE trial bring pre-hospital eCPR to the Netherlands

In the metropolitan area of Paris, France, a mobile intensive care unit has used ECMO and eCPR in the treatment of OHCA patients for many years. Dr. Lionel Lamhaut’s team tracked outcome data from the mobile intensive care unit from 2011 to 2015. Their research identified 156 patients treated with eCPR. The data suggests that early intervention of any kind improved survival rates, but a more aggressive eCPR strategy even raised survival rates in refractory OHCA patients from 3% to 38%. [9]

Clinical research supports the use of eCPR

Observational studies [10][11] suggest that eCPR is associated with an increase in survival compared with conventional CPR in selected patients, but recently published randomized controlled trials now provide higher certainty.

The “ARREST” single-center, randomized controlled trial (2020) [12], which was performed by a team of the University of Minnesota in the Minneapolis metropolitan area (USA), demonstrated that eCPR can improve survival in carefully selected OHCA patients. ARREST was the first randomized trial of eCPR that demonstrated a survival benefit from VA-ECMO in OHCA patients. Thirty OHCA patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) were transported to the hospital under mechanical CPR. They were then randomized into either an eCPR arm where ECMO was initiated in the cath lab, and a control arm where standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) was applied. Within the eCPR group, 43% of patients survived to discharge, compared with 7% of patients in the ACLS group. The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis after 30 patients due to the superior results in the eCPR arm.

ARREST trial mobile eCPR

Mobile eCPR for Cardiac Arrest as performed in the ARREST trial [13] 

Table_ARREST trial patient grouping.png

Patient grouping in the ARREST trial

In another trial conducted in Prague (Czech Republic), Belohlavek et al. (2022)[14] examined whether early interventions such as transport, eCPR, and other treatments improve outcomes for OHCA patients at 180 days. More than 4,000 OHCA patients were evaluated with 264 ultimately meeting inclusion criteria and enrolled in the randomized trial comparing hyperinvasive techniques against the standard ACLS protocol at the scene.

In the main analysis, 31.5% of the invasive strategy group and 22.0% of the standard strategy group survived to 180 days with good neurologic outcomes. While the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.09), the absolute difference of 9.5% in favor of ECMO was promising. These results intersected a prespecified stopping rule for futility.

Additionally, the invasive strategy group showed significantly better rates of neurologic recovery at 30 days than the standard strategy group (30.6% vs. 18.2%, respectively, p = 0.02).

Study outcomes (eCPR in refractory OHCA)[14]

Outcomes Invasive group (%) Standard group (%) Absolute difference (95% CI) p Value
Survival with minimal or no neurologic impairment at 180 days 39 (31.5) 29 (22) 9.5 (-1.3-20.1) 0.09
Survival with minimal or no neurologic impairment at 30 days 38 (30.6) 24 (18.2) 12.4 (1.9-22.7) 0.02
Cardiac recovery at 30 days 54 (43.5) 45 (34.1) 9.4 (-2.5-21) 0.12

The results suggest a benefit to an invasive approach that includes eCPR, with a 9.5% improvement in survival and CPC 1 or 2.

CPC Scale Grafik.png

Although a proper selection of patients who will benefit from eCPR is essential, to date there is no consensus about the criteria for starting intra-arrest transport and implementing eCPR. Patients without prehospital ROSC (Return of Spontaneous Circulation) have very low chances to survive even with prolonged conventional ACLS without eCPR (median time 66 min). Initial shockable rhythm, younger age and shorter time of resuscitation were all associated with better 180-day survival in refractory OHCA (r-OHCA). The majority of r-OHCA survivors treated with eCPR had good neurological outcomes at 180 days.[15]

Positive early data supports the value of future research

While additional research is warranted, early examples show a positive correlation between well-coordinated early intervention with eCPR and improved clinical outcomes for OHCA patients. This may prove to be particularly important due to the increased incidence and fatality rate of OHCA during the pandemic period.[16][17] Bringing VA-ECMO to patients in the field reduces the time to treatment and can potentially increase the rates of survival.

Related Articles

  1. 1. Yan S, et al. The global survival rate among adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2020;24:61.

  2. 2. Panchal AR, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142:(16, suppl 2):S366-S468.

  3. 3. ELSO eCPR Supplement to the ELSO General Guidelines Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Guidelines for ECPR Cases. 2013.

  4. 4. Abrams D, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications. Intensive Care Medicine. 2022;48:1-15.

  5. 5. Frankel, J. University of Minnesota Launches Mobile ECMO Truck with Virtual Reality Component. Posted February 5, 2021. Accessed November 28, 2022. https://emsrig.com/2021/02/05/university-of-minnesota-launches-mobile-ecmo-truck-with-virtual-reality-component/

  6. 6. Miranda, DR. ON-SCENE Initiation of Extracorporeal CardioPulmonary Resuscitation During Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (ON-SCENE). NCT04620070. Posted November 6, 2020. Accessed November 15, 2022.  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04620070

  7. 7. N.A. On-Scene trial. The First Nationwide PreHospital ECPR program. Potential Benefits. Accessed November 28, 2022. https://onscenetrial.com/potential-benefits/

  8. 8. Suverein, M. et al. Ethics of ECPR research. Resuscitation. 2021;169:136-142.

  9. 9. Lamhaut L, et al. A Pre-Hospital Extracorporeal Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) strategy for treatment of refractory out hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study and propensity analysis. Resuscitation. 2017;117:109-117.

  10. 10. Michels G, et al. Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC. Anaesthesist. 2018;67:(8):607-616.

  11. 11. Debaty G, et al. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation recipients following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2018;112:1–10

  12. 12. Yannopoulos D, et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1807-1816.

  13. 13. Bartos JA, et al. The Minnesota mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation consortium for treatment of out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation: Program description, performance, and outcomes. eClinicalMedicine. 2020;29:1-10.

  14. 14. Belohlavek J, et al. Effect of Intra-arrest Transport, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and Immediate Invasive Assessment and Treatment on Functional Neurologic Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327(8):737–747.

  15. 15. Rob D, et al. Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial. Critical Care. 2022;26:330.

  16. 16. Teoh SE, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Intensive Care. 2021;11:169.

  17. 17. Lai PH, Lancet EA, Weiden MD, Webber MP, Zeig-Owens R, Hall CB, Prezant DJ. Characteristics Associated With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests and Resuscitations During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in New York City. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(10):1154-1163.