Select region

Servo-i Mechanical Ventilator

A wealth of features and functionalities for treating adult, pediatric and neonatal patients.

Getinge Servo-i mechanicalventilator screen showing Automodeventilation mode
Getinge Servo-i mechanicalventilator tubeset and Aerogennebulization
Getinge Servo-i mechanicalventilator showing Automodeventilation mode

A single ventilator to treat every patient, everywhere

Servo-i delivers a high level of clinical performance for a variety of situations and for all patients. This helps clinicians provide cost-effective care throughout the hospital.

Nurse with Servo brochure

Ensure maximum uptime

Optimizing your equipment's services is often an untapped opportunity to maximize productivity and reduce costs. Our Getinge Care service offering will ensure that your equipment always perform at peak levels allowing you to focus on what’s important - saving lives.

products consumables ventilator

High quality consumables

We offer an extensive range of readily available consumables designed for highest possible patient safety and ease of use – all to help secure your everyday operations.


Patient data at your fingertips

MSync helps you to connect your Servo-i fleet to your patient monitor, HIS or patient data management system (PDMS). Clinical and patient data is transferred in real time to support clinical decision-making.

Related products

A complete spectrum of treatment opportunities

Servo-i features all the modes you would expect from an advanced ventilation system in one adaptable platform. It also presents a wide range of tools to help you stabilize your patient and wean them off the ventilator.

Caring hands

Stress Index

Stress Index [1],[2],[3] can help the clinician detect and prevent harmful ventilatory patterns, such as barotrauma, i.e. overdistension of the airways and lungs.

Open Lung Tool

Open Lung Tool

The Open Lung Tool makes it easier to assess recruitment efficacy. On-screen values, such as dynamic compliance, assists you during lung recruitment and PEEP titration.



Heliox minimizes turbulence and improves CO2 elimination.[4] Easing the work of breathing for patients from neonate to adult. It can be used in all modes of ventilation.

servo-i automode


Automode helps your patients' transition into spontaneous breathing with less need for staff intervention. It is an interactive mode that switches between controlled and supported ventilation conditional to patient effort.

NAVA edi illustration

Edi - The respiratory vital sign of respiration

A bedside diagnostic tool that allows you to monitor and safeguard the patients diaphragm activity.[5],[6] Making it easier to identify over-assist, over-sedation and asynchrony when optimizing ventilation delivery and assessing weaning readiness.[7],[8]

Ventilatory support


Ventilatory support delivered in proportion to and in synchrony with the patient’s own respiratory drive[9],[10] NAVA shortens the time of mechanical ventilation[11] and increases the number of ventilator-free days[11],[12],[13] by providing personalized ventilation that is both lung- and diaphragm-protective. 

Servo-i MR - patient and doctors

MR Conditional

Servo-i MR provides continuity of care for critically ill patients throughout the MR process. Full trigger sensitivity and a range of ventilation options are available for use with all patient categories.

Servo-i HBO

HBO Conditional

Servo-i HBO can provide ICU-quality ventilation in the hyperbaric chamber. It has full monitoring capabilities and delivers ventilation down to a depth of 30 meters. It is available for all patient categories.

Visit our Academy – training and education designed to enhance your proficiency

For more information about our onsite events or remote trainings, you can also contact your local sales & service representative.

  1. 1. Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, et al. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 15;175(2):160-6.

  2. 2. Grasso S, Stripoli T, De Michele M, et al. ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct 15;176(8):761-7.

  3. 3. Ferrando C, et al. Adjusting tidal volume to stress index in an open lung condition optimizes ventilation and prevents overdistension in an experimental model of lung injury and reduced chest wall compliance. Crit Care. 2015 Jan 13;19:9. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0726-3.

  4. 4. Herman J, Baram M. In the Midst of Turbulence, Heliox Kept Her Alive. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. 2 Pilbeam

  5. 5. Ducharme-Crevier L, et al. Interest of Monitoring Diaphragmatic Electrical Activity in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:384210.

  6. 6. Emeriaud G, Larouche A, Ducharme-Crevier L, Massicotte E, Fléchelles O, Peller¬in-Leblanc AA, Orneau S, Beck J, Jouvet P. Evolution of inspiratory diaphragm activity in children over the course of the PICU stay.

  7. 7. Kallio M, et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in pediatric intensive care – a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jan;50(1):55-62.

  8. 8. Bellani G, Pesenti A. Assessing effort and work of breathing. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):352-8.

  9. 9. Sinderby C, et al. Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med. 1999 Dec;5(12):1433-6.

  10. 10. Jonkmann A, et al. Proportional modes of ventilation: technology to assist physiology Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug 11;1-13.

  11. 11. Kacmarek R, et al. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2020. Sep 6 : 1–11.

  12. 12. Liu L, et al. Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist versus Pressure Support Ventilation in Difficult Weaning. A Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. 2020 Jun;132(6):1482-1493.

  13. 13. Hadfield D, et al Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial performed in patients at risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation Critical Care 2020 May 14;24(1):220.